Two widely recognized frameworks—SOC 2 Type II and HITRUST CSF—help organizations showcase their commitment to protecting information. In this guide, we’ll explore the pros and cons of conducting these audits together, along with considerations for modern compliance practices.
What Are SOC 2 Type II and HITRUST?
SOC 2 Type II
An auditing standard that evaluates an organization’s controls over security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy over a period of time. Unlike Type I, Type II focuses on the effectiveness of controls over several months.
HITRUST CSF
A certifiable framework that integrates multiple standards—including HIPAA, ISO 27001, and NIST 800-53—to help organizations manage regulatory and risk requirements efficiently. In 2026, HITRUST emphasizes cloud security, continuous monitoring, and alignment with modern privacy regulations.
Why Consider Simultaneous Audits?
SOC 2 and HITRUST share many control requirements, such as access management, encryption, and incident response. Conducting audits together can be appealing for organizations seeking efficiency, but it’s not without challenges.
Pros of Simultaneous Audits
1. Time Savings
Auditors can often review overlapping controls simultaneously, reducing the overall audit duration and minimizing disruption to business operations.
2. Cost Efficiency
Shared audit efforts—such as documentation review, auditor fees, and travel expenses—can result in significant cost savings compared to separate audits.
3. Comprehensive Security Demonstration
Organizations can showcase a holistic approach to data protection, reassuring customers, partners, and regulators that their data security practices meet multiple recognized standards.
4. Modern Compliance Alignment
With updated HITRUST and SOC 2 guidance emphasizing automation, simultaneous audits can be coordinated through audit orchestration platforms, reducing manual effort and improving compliance accuracy.
Cons of Simultaneous Audits
1. Complexity
Each framework has unique requirements. Managing dual documentation, evidence collection, and control mapping can be challenging, especially for smaller teams.
2. Resource-Intensive
Simultaneous audits require additional planning, coordination, and personnel. Organizations without dedicated compliance staff may find this approach demanding.
3. Risk of Audit Failure
Failing one control can impact both certifications. This could lead to costly remediation, delayed certification, and operational setbacks.
4. Increased Planning Requirements
Coordinating multiple auditors and aligning schedules can create additional administrative overhead.
Key Considerations Before Attempting Both
- Evaluate your organization’s resources, compliance maturity, and risk tolerance.
- Consider leveraging audit orchestration tools to automate control mapping and evidence collection.
- Map overlapping controls between SOC 2 Type II and HITRUST to identify efficiencies.
- Engage experienced auditors who are familiar with conducting simultaneous audits.
Conclusion
Undergoing SOC 2 Type II and HITRUST audits simultaneously can save time, reduce costs, and demonstrate robust data security. However, the process is complex, resource-intensive, and carries a higher risk if your organization is not fully compliant.
Looking to streamline your SOC 2 and HITRUST audits? Com-Sec offers expert compliance services to help your organization achieve certifications efficiently while maintaining security, cost-effectiveness, and regulatory confidence.
Ready to Streamline Your Compliance Audits?
Don't navigate complex dual audits alone. Partner with Com-Sec to map controls, reduce overlap, and get certified faster.